Intent v. Impact: Are We Set Up to Fail?

Name is required to receive end of conference attendance certificate. The responses will only be shared with the AADCP Board and the specific presenter(s).
Strongly disagreeDisagreeNeutralAgreeStrongly agree
Strongly disagreeDisagreeNeutralAgreeStrongly agree
Strongly disagreeDisagreeNeutralAgreeStrongly agree
My knowledge increased as a result of this workshop
Note: While this session is aimed at impaired driving treatment court practitioners, much of the information also applies outside of that arena to other models of treatment court, treatment, and supervision. Impaired driving treatment court practitioners want the best for the people they serve. Utilizing a variety of tools, resources, and services enables the team to respond to the specific needs an individual has; thereby providing the greatest chance for a successful outcome. However, having a systematic (i.e., treating everyone the same) and inflexible approach in responding to one’s needs may have an impact that differs from the intent. Sometimes, the best intentions miss their mark; other times, they have a negative impact. A team needs to understand how to create a program and respond to behaviors that don’t set up the program or the individual to fail. This session will examine the common missteps in providing treatment, incentivizing participation, creating case plans and court requirements, costs of services, and responding to behavior.